TY - JOUR AU - Peterson, John AU - Wilson, Trevor AU - Gruhl, Joshua AU - Davis, Sydney AU - Olsen, Jaxon AU - Parsons, Matthew AU - Kann, Benjamin AU - Fagerlin, Angela AU - Watt, Melissa AU - Johnson, Skyler PY - 2022 DA - 2022/6/7 TI -来自众筹平台的见解的替代癌症治疗的时机和动机:横断混合方法研究JO - JMIR癌症SP - e34183 VL - 8 IS - 2kw -互联网KW -健康错误信息KW -在线众筹KW -替代医学KW -互联网研究伦理AB -背景:替代癌症治疗与死亡率增加有关，但对那些追求它的人知之甚少。目的:我们旨在描述个体使用替代癌症疗法的动机，并确定动机是否因个体寻求替代疗法的时间而不同。方法:我们使用了2011年至2019年在GoFundMe网站上发布的649项活动的数据，这些活动是针对寻求替代疗法的癌症受益者的。使用混合方法对数据进行分析。运动根据替代疗法的时间进行分类(在接受常规疗法之前或之后)。定性分析确定了动机主题。独立卡方检验和Fisher检验(均为双侧)确定了组间动机主题存在显著差异。结果:首先使用常规疗法的个体比开始使用替代疗法的个体更有可能表达对常规疗法疗效的担忧(63.3% vs 41.7%;P <措施)。 Moreover, on comparing those who started with alternative therapy and those who switched from conventional to alternative therapy, those who started with alternative therapy more often expressed natural and holistic values (49.3% vs 27.0%; P<.001), expressed an unorthodox understanding of cancer (25.5% vs 16.4%; P=.004), referenced religious or spiritual beliefs (15.1% vs 8.9%; P=.01), perceived alternative treatment as efficacious (19.1% vs 10.2%; P=.001), and distrusted pharmaceutical companies (3.2% vs 0.5%; P=.04). Conclusions: Individuals sought treatments that reflected their values and beliefs, even if scientifically unfounded. Many individuals who reported prior conventional cancer therapy were motivated to pursue alternative treatments because they perceived the conventional treatments to be ineffective. SN - 2369-1999 UR - https://cancer.www.mybigtv.com/2022/2/e34183 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/34183 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35671074 DO - 10.2196/34183 ID - info:doi/10.2196/34183 ER -