%0期刊文章%@ 2564-1891 %I JMIR出版物%V 2% 卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析N 2% P e38242% T基于web的新斯科舍省视为同意的器官捐赠立法的观点:Facebook群组评论的主题分析Marcon,Alessandro R %A Wagner,Darren N %A Giles,Carly %A Isenor,Cynthia +亚伯达大学法学院健康法律研究所，办公室470，埃德蒙顿，AB, T6G 2H5，加拿大，1 613 620 8970，marcon@ualberta.ca %K器官捐献%K器官移植%K视为同意%K推定同意%K社交媒体%K Facebook %K公众认知%K公共政策%K专题分析%D 2022 %7 14.9.2022 %9原始论文%J JMIR信息病学%G英文%X背景:加拿大新斯科舍省最近成为北美第一个实施视为同意器官捐献立法的司法管辖区。改变同意模式是该省提高器官和组织捐献和移植率的一个更大项目的一个方面。被视为同意的立法在公众中可能存在争议，而公众参与是该计划成功实施的必要条件。社交媒体是人们表达观点和讨论话题的关键空间，社交媒体话语可以影响公众的认知。该项目旨在研究新斯科舍省的公众如何应对Facebook群组中的立法变化。方法:使用Facebook的搜索引擎，我们搜索了在2020年1月1日至2021年5月1日期间出现在Facebook公共群组中使用“视为同意”、“假定同意”、“选择退出”或“器官捐赠”和“新斯科舍省”等词的帖子。最终的数据集包括新斯科舍省12个不同的公开Facebook群组中26个相关帖子的2337条评论。我们对意见进行了主题和内容分析，以确定公众对立法变化的反应，以及参与者在讨论中如何相互交流。 Results: Our thematic analysis revealed principal themes that supported and critiqued the legislation, raised specific issues, and reflected on the topic from a neutral perspective. Subthemes showed individuals presenting perspectives through a variety of themes, including compassion, anger, frustration, mistrust, and a range of argumentative tactics. The comments included personal narratives, beliefs about the government, altruism, autonomy, misinformation, and reflections on religion and death. Content analysis revealed that Facebook users reacted to popular comments with “likes” more than other reactions. Comments with the most reactions included both negative and positive perspectives about the legislation. Personal donation and transplantation success stories, as well as attempts to correct misinformation, were some of the most “liked” positive comments. Conclusions: The findings provide key insights into perspectives of individuals from Nova Scotia on deemed consent legislation, as well as organ donation and transplantation broadly. The insights derived from this analysis can contribute to public understanding, policy creation, and public outreach efforts that might occur in other jurisdictions considering the enactment of similar legislation. %R 10.2196/38242 %U https://infodemiology.www.mybigtv.com/2022/2/e38242 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/38242