基于智能设备的耳鸣再训练疗法的治疗效果:卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析前瞻性队列研究%A Suh,Myung-Whan, A Park,Moo Kyun, A Kim,Yoonjoong, A Kim,Young Ho %+首尔市府-首尔国立大学博拉梅医疗中心耳鼻咽喉头颈外科，07061，首尔铜雀区博拉梅路5号路20号，韩国，82 28702442yhkiment@gmail.com %K耳鸣%K耳鸣再训练疗法%K智能设备%K声音疗法%K康复%K疗法%K片剂应用%K基于应用%K疗法%K数字疗法%K设备疗法%D 2023 %7背景:耳鸣再训练疗法(TRT)是耳鸣的标准治疗方法，由指导咨询和声音治疗组成。然而，它是基于面对面的教育和一个耗时的协议。基于智能设备的TRT (Smart -TRT)似乎有很多优点，但这种新疗法的疗效一直受到质疑。目的:本研究的目的是比较智能TRT和常规TRT (convt -TRT)的疗效。方法:选取84例耳鸣患者。结果比较了42名接受smart-TRT治疗的患者和42名接受反trt治疗的对照组。在smart- trt组中使用交互式智能pad应用程序进行指导咨询。智能pad的应用包括耳部解剖、耳鸣神经生理模型、习惯化概念和声音治疗的详细教育。 The smart-TRT was bidirectional: There were 17 multiple choice questions between each lesson as an interim check. The conv-TRT group underwent traditional person-to-person counseling. The primary outcome measure was the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), and the secondary outcome measure was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Both treatments had a significant treatment effect, which comparably improved during the first 2 months. The best improvements in THI were –23.3 (95% CI –33.1 to –13.4) points at 3 months and –16.8 (95% CI –30.8 to –2.8) points at 2 months in the smart-TRT group and conv-TRT group, respectively. The improvements on the VAS were also comparable: smart-TRT group: –1.2 to –3.3; conv-TRT: –0.7 to –1.7. Conclusions: TRT based on smart devices can be an effective alternative for tinnitus patients. Considering the amount of time needed for person-to-person counseling, smart-TRT can be a cost-effective solution with similar treatment outcomes as conv-TRT. %M 36633890 %R 10.2196/38986 %U https://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2023/1/e38986 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/38986 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36633890