%0期刊文章@ 2291-5222 %I JMIR出版公司%V 1% 卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析N 2% P e24% T正念为基础的移动应用程序:文献回顾与现状分析%A Plaza,Inmaculada %A Demarzo,Marcelo Marcos Piva %A Herrera-Mercadal,Paola %A García-Campayo,Javier %+研究所Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud，萨拉戈萨大学精神病学系，Avda Isabel la Católica 1，萨拉戈萨，50009，西班牙，34 976253621，jgarcamp@gmail.com %K移动健康%K移动健康%K正念%K社交网络%K个性化教育%K健康信息学%K证据医学%D 2013 %7 01.11.2013 %9综述%J JMIR移动健康Uhealth %G英语%X背景:对正念的兴趣呈指数级增长，特别是在心理学和医学领域。正念的特征或状态与心理健康的几个指标显著相关，基于正念的疗法在预防和治疗许多慢性疾病方面是有效的。人们对促进健康和疾病自我管理的移动应用程序的兴趣也在增长。尽管兴趣爆炸式增长，但关于基于正念的移动应用程序(mbma)的设计和潜在用途的研究很少。目的:我们的主要目的是研究当前mbma的特征和功能，并将其与当前健康和临床环境中的循证文献进行比较。方法:我们搜索了在线供应商市场、科学期刊数据库和与mbma相关的灰色文献。我们包括了以正念为特色的移动应用程序，这些应用程序与正念技术的训练或日常练习有关。我们从文献中排除了基于观点的文章。 Results: The literature search resulted in 11 eligible matches, two of which completely met our selection criteria–a pilot study designed to evaluate the feasibility of a MBMA to train the practice of “walking meditation,” and an exploratory study of an application consisting of mood reporting scales and mindfulness-based mobile therapies. The online market search eventually analyzed 50 available MBMAs. Of these, 8% (4/50) did not work, thus we only gathered information about language, downloads, or prices. The most common operating system was Android. Of the analyzed apps, 30% (15/50) have both a free and paid version. MBMAs were devoted to daily meditation practice (27/46, 59%), mindfulness training (6/46, 13%), assessments or tests (5/46, 11%), attention focus (4/46, 9%), and mixed objectives (4/46, 9%). We found 108 different resources, of which the most used were reminders, alarms, or bells (21/108, 19.4%), statistics tools (17/108, 15.7%), audio tracks (15/108, 13.9%), and educational texts (11/108, 10.2%). Daily, weekly, monthly statistics, or reports were provided by 37% (17/46) of the apps. 28% (13/46) of them permitted access to a social network. No information about sensors was available. The analyzed applications seemed not to use any external sensor. English was the only language of 78% (39/50) of the apps, and only 8% (4/50) provided information in Spanish. 20% (9/46) of the apps have interfaces that are difficult to use. No specific apps exist for professionals or, at least, for both profiles (users and professionals). We did not find any evaluations of health outcomes resulting from the use of MBMAs. Conclusions: While a wide selection of MBMAs seem to be available to interested people, this study still shows an almost complete lack of evidence supporting the usefulness of those applications. We found no randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of these applications on mindfulness training or health indicators, and the potential for mobile mindfulness applications remains largely unexplored. %M 25099314 %R 10.2196/mhealth.2733 %U http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2013/2/e24/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.2733 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25099314