%0期刊文章%@ 2291-5222 %I JMIR出版物%V 6% 卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析N 6% P e135% T国际移动医疗研究的可视化协作特征和主题爆发:文献计量学分析%沈a，熊丽丽，李冰，魏兰，富强%埃文斯，Richard %张a，魏%+华中科技大学同济医学院医学与健康管理学院，武汉航空路13号，430030,86 027 83692730，shenln@163.com %K协作特征%K主题爆发%K国际移动健康%K移动健康%K远程医疗%K文献计量分析%K文献计量%K研究趋势%D 2018 %7 05.06.2018 %9原始论文%J JMIR移动健康Uhealth %G英文%X背景:在过去的几十年里，移动技术在医疗保健服务领域被广泛采用，以提高获得医疗服务的可及性和质量。移动健康(mHealth)作为一个新兴的研究领域，越来越受到科研人员的重视，相关文献的报道也在迅速增加。目的:本研究旨在分析移动健康领域的研究现状(包括论文产出)，以揭示国际移动健康研究的深度合作特征和话题爆发。方法:作者收集了近20年发表的文献，并由汤森路透Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)检索。采用了各种统计技术和文献计量措施，包括出版物增长分析;期刊分布;以及作者、机构和国家合作层面的合作网络分析。绘制突发项的时间可视化图，通过层次聚类分析和社会网络分析对突发项的共现矩阵进行分析。 Results: A total of 2704 bibliographic records on mHealth were collected. The earliest paper centered on mHealth was published in 1997, with the number of papers rising continuously since then. A total of 21.28% (2318/10,895) of authors publishing mHealth research were first author, whereas only 1.29% (141/10,895) of authors had published one paper. The total degree of author collaboration was 4.42 (11,958/2704) and there are 266 core authors who have collectively published 53.07% (1435/2704) of the total number of publications, which means that the core group of authors has fundamentally been formed based on the Law of Price. The University of Michigan published the highest number of mHealth-related publications, but less collaboration among institutions exits. The United States is the most productive country in the field and plays a leading role in collaborative research on mHealth. There are 5543 different identified keywords in the cleaned records. The temporal bar graph clearly presents overall topic evolutionary process over time. There are 12 important research directions identified, which are in the imbalanced development. Moreover, the density of the network was 0.007, a relatively low level. These 12 topics can be categorized into 4 areas: (1) patient engagement and patient intervention, (2) health monitoring and self-care, (3) mobile device and mobile computing, and (4) security and privacy. Conclusions: The collaboration of core authors on mHealth research is not tight and stable. Furthermore, collaboration between institutions mainly occurs in the United States, although country collaboration is seen as relatively scarce. The focus of research topics on mHealth is decentralized. Our study might provide a potential guide for future research in mHealth. %R 10.2196/mhealth.9581 %U http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2018/6/e135/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9581