TY -非盟的摩尼Madhavan AU -卡文纳,大卫J盟——隐藏,Leanne盟——Stoyanov斯托亚R PY - 2015 DA - 2015/08/19 TI -审查和评价正念乔的iPhone应用程序——JMIR mHealth uHealth SP - e82六世- 3 - 3 KW -正念KW -正念移动应用KW -移动健康(mHealth)千瓦-心理健康AB -背景:越来越多的证据正念的健康产生积极的影响。基于正念的移动应用程序可能有潜力成为培训的另一种传播媒介。虽然有数百个这样的应用程序，但几乎没有关于它们质量的信息。目的:本研究旨在对基于正念的iPhone移动应用程序进行系统回顾，并使用最新开发的专家评级量表——移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)来评估它们的质量。它还旨在描述精选的高质量正念应用程序的功能。方法:在iTunes和Google Apps Marketplace中搜索“正念”。其中包括提供正念训练和教育的应用程序。那些只包含提醒、计时器或引导冥想的歌曲被排除在外。一位专家评估师使用MARS参与度、功能、视觉美学、信息质量和主观质量子量表对应用程序质量进行了评估和评级。第二评级机构为30%的应用程序提供了MARS评级，以达到评级机构间可靠性的目的。 Results: The “mindfulness” search identified 700 apps. However, 94 were duplicates, 6 were not accessible and 40 were not in English. Of the remaining 560, 23 apps met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The median MARS score was 3.2 (out of 5.0), which exceeded the minimum acceptable score (3.0). The Headspace app had the highest average score (4.0), followed by Smiling Mind (3.7), iMindfulness (3.5) and Mindfulness Daily (3.5). There was a high level of inter-rater reliability between the two MARS raters. Conclusions: Though many apps claim to be mindfulness-related, most were guided meditation apps, timers, or reminders. Very few had high ratings on the MARS subscales of visual aesthetics, engagement, functionality or information quality. Little evidence is available on the efficacy of the apps in developing mindfulness. SN - 2291-5222 UR - http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2015/3/e82/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4328 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290327 DO - 10.2196/mhealth.4328 ID - info:doi/10.2196/mhealth.4328 ER -