TY -非盟的梁,小君非盟——西安,Deqiang盟——刘Xingyu盟,傅京盟——张Xingting AU - Tang Buzhou AU - Lei,简帛PY - 2018 DA - 2018/11/08 TI -可用性研究主流可穿戴的健身设备:功能分析和系统可用性量表评价乔- JMIR Mhealth Uhealth SP - e11066六世- 6 - 11 KW -可穿戴设备KW -可用性千瓦系统可用性规模KW -函数比较KW -健身AB -背景:可穿戴设备具有促进健康生活方式的潜力，因为它们具有实时数据监控功能。然而，设备可用性是决定它们是否会被大规模采用的关键因素。可穿戴设备的可用性研究仍然很少。目的:比较7种主流可穿戴设备的功能和属性，评价其可用性。方法:选择Apple Watch、Samsung Gear S、Fitbit Surge、Jawbone Up3、小米手环、华为荣耀B2、Misfit Shine等可穿戴设备。采用基于388名参与者的特征比较与系统可用性量表(SUS)混合评价方法;SUS得分越高，产品的可用性越好。结果:在功能方面，所有设备都具有步数计数，活动计时器和距离记录功能。三星Gear S拥有独特的运动轨迹录制功能，华为荣耀B2拥有独特的无线耳机。 The Apple Watch, Samsung Gear S, Jawbone Up3, and Fitbit Surge could measure heart rate. All the devices were able to monitor sleep, except the Apple Watch. For product characteristics, including attributes such as weight, battery life, price, and 22 functions such as step counting, activity time, activity type identification, sleep monitoring, and expandable new features, we found a very weak negative correlation between the SUS scores and price (r=−.10, P=.03) and devices that support expandable new features (r=−.11, P=.02), and a very weak positive correlation between the SUS scores and devices that support the activity type identification function (r=.11, P=.02). The Huawei Honor B2 received the highest score of mean 67.6 (SD 16.1); the lowest Apple Watch score was only 61.4 (SD 14.7). No significant difference was observed among brands. The SUS score had a moderate positive correlation with the user’s experience (length of time the device was used) (r=.32, P<.001); participants in the medical and health care industries gave a significantly higher score (mean 61.1, SD 17.9 vs mean 68.7, SD 14.5, P=.03). Conclusions: The functions of wearable devices tend to be homogeneous and usability is similar across various brands. Overall, Mi Band had the lowest price and the lightest weight. Misfit Shine had the longest battery life and most functions, and participants in the medical and health care industries had the best evaluation of wearable devices. The perceived usability of mainstream wearable devices is unsatisfactory and customer loyalty is not high. A consumer’s SUS rating for a wearable device is related to their personal situation instead of the device brand. Device manufacturers should put more effort into developing innovative functions and improving the usability of their products by integrating more cognitive behavior change techniques. SN - 2291-5222 UR - http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2018/11/e11066/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/11066 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409767 DO - 10.2196/11066 ID - info:doi/10.2196/11066 ER -