TY - JOUR AU - Meirte, Jill AU - Hellemans, Nick AU - Anthonissen, Mieke AU - Denteneer, Lenie AU - Maertens, Koen AU - Moortgat, Peter AU - Van Daele, Ulrike PY - 2020 DA - 20/4/3 TI -电子患者报告结果测量的利弊:系统评价JO - JMIR Perioper Med SP - e15588 VL - 3 IS - 1 KW -电子患者报告的结果测量KW -纸质患者报告的结果测量KW -系统评价KW -优点KW -缺陷AB -背景:患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)在临床实践和研究中很重要。电子健康技术的发展为通过prom系统收集信息提供了前所未有的机会。目的:本研究的目的是对定性电子患者报告结局测量(eprom)数字收集的好处、障碍和缺点进行客观和全面的概述。方法:我们对PubMED和Web of Science上检索到的文章进行了系统综述。在所有阶段都遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)首选报告项目指南。搜索策略总共产生了2333条记录，其中32条符合预定义的纳入和排除标准。从每项研究中提取eprom相关信息。结果:结果以优势和劣势聚类。据报道，eprom的好处是更大的患者偏好和接受度，更低的成本，相似或更快的完成时间，更高的数据质量和响应率，以及促进症状管理和患者-临床医生沟通。 Tablets were the most used ePROM modality (14/32, 44%), and, as a platform, Web-based systems were used the most (26/32, 81%). Potential disadvantages of ePROMs include privacy protection, a possible large initial financial investment, and exclusion of certain populations or the “digital divide.” Conclusions: In conclusion, ePROMs offer many advantages over paper-based collection of patient-reported outcomes. Overall, ePROMs are preferred over paper-based methods, improve data quality, result in similar or faster completion time, decrease costs, and facilitate clinical decision making and symptom management. Disadvantages regarding ePROMs have been outlined, and suggestions are provided to overcome the barriers. We provide a path forward for researchers and clinicians interested in implementing ePROMs. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018094795; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=94795 SN - 2561-9128 UR - http://periop.www.mybigtv.com/2020/1/e15588/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/15588 DO - 10.2196/15588 ID - info:doi/10.2196/15588 ER -