@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir。2745，作者=“Blackman, Kacie CA和Zoellner, Jamie和Berrey, Leanna M和Alexander, Ramine和Fanning, Jason和Hill, Jennie L和Estabrooks, Paul A”，标题=“评估移动健康体育活动促进干预的内部和外部有效性:使用RE-AIM框架的系统文献综述”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2013”，月=“10”，日=“04”，卷=“15”，数=“10”，页=“e224”，关键词=“体育活动;移动技术;审查;概括性”，抽象=“背景:移动健康(mHealth)干预措施在促进身体活动(PA)方面是有效的;然而，外部效度指标报告的程度尚不清楚。目的:本系统综述的目的是使用RE-AIM(覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护)框架来确定移动健康干预研究促进PA报告的程度，这些因素告知跨环境和人群的普遍性，并为计划开展这类研究的研究者提供建议。方法:通过系统审查过程(即查询三个在线数据库和合格文章参考列表)确定了反映2000年至2012年期间发表的15项试验的20篇文章，并满足纳入标准(即移动技术的实施、目标身体活动和提供原始数据)。两名研究人员使用经过验证的RE-AIM数据提取工具(覆盖面、功效/有效性、采用、实施、维护)对每篇文章进行编码。研究小组的两名成员从每篇文章中独立提取信息(评分者之间的信度>90{\%})，并通过小组会议就差异达成共识。 Results: The majority of studies were randomized controlled trials (n=14). The average reporting across RE-AIM indicators varied by dimension (reach=53.3{\%}, 2.67/5; effectiveness/efficacy=60.0{\%}, 2.4/4; adoption=11.1{\%}, 0.7/6; implementation=24.4{\%}, 0.7/3; maintenance=0{\%}, 0/3). While most studies described changes in the primary outcome (effectiveness), few addressed the representativeness of participants (reach) or settings (adoption) and few reported on issues related to maintenance and degree of implementation fidelity. Conclusions: This review suggests that more focus is needed on research designs that highlight and report on both internal and external validity indicators. Specific recommendations are provided to encourage future mHealth interventionists and investigators to report on representativeness, settings, delivery agents for planned interventions, the extent to which protocol is delivered as intended, and maintenance of effects at the individual or organizational level. ", issn="14388871", doi="10.2196/jmir.2745", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2013/10/e224/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2745", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24095951" }