@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/13266，作者=“Osadchiy, Timur和Poliakov, Ivan和Olivier, Patrick和Rowland, Maisie和Foster, Emma”，标题=“进步性24小时回忆:基于web的饮食评估调查中短记忆间隔的可用性研究”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2020”，月=“Feb”，日=“3”，卷=“22”，数=“2”，页=“e13266”，关键词=“计算机系统;营养调查;饮食记录;营养评估;背景:由于人类记忆的局限性，报告不足是使用24小时多通道回忆法进行饮食评估调查的主要挑战之一。研究表明，缩短记忆间隔(即进食事件和回忆之间的时间)可以减轻记忆负担，并可能提高评估的准确性。目的:本研究旨在探讨基于渐进式召回的基于网络的饮食评估调查的准确性和可接受性，在该调查中，被调查者被要求在24小时内使用多通道协议和24小时召回的份量估计方法记录多次召回。方法:实验采用饮食评估系统Intake24进行，该系统通常采用多通道24小时回忆法，受访者在单一场合记录他们前一天的所有膳食。我们修改了系统，允许受访者在一天中使用多通道协议和24小时召回(渐进召回)的部分大小估计方法添加多个召回。我们对33名参与者进行了一项饮食评估调查，要求他们仅在工作日使用24小时和渐进回忆法记录饮食摄入量。 We compared mean retention intervals (ie, the time between eating event and recall) for the 2 methods. To examine accuracy, we compared mean energy estimates and the mean number of reported foods. Of these participants, 23 were interviewed to examine the acceptability of the progressive recall. Results: Retention intervals were found to be, on average, 15.2 hours (SD 7.8) shorter during progressive recalls than those during 24-hour recalls. We found that the mean number of foods reported for evening meals for progressive recalls (5.2 foods) was significantly higher (P=.001) than that for 24-hour recalls (4.2 foods). The number of foods and the amount of energy reported for other meals remained similar across the 2 methods. In interviews, 65{\%} (15/23) of participants said that the 24-hour recall is more convenient in terms of fitting in with their daily lifestyles, and 65{\%} (15/23) of respondents indicated that they remembered meal content and portion sizes better with the progressive recall. Conclusions: The analysis of interviews and data from our study indicate that progressive recalls provide minor improvements to the accuracy of dietary assessment in Intake24. Additional work is needed to improve the acceptability of progressive recalls in this system. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/13266", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2020/2/e13266", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/13266", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012055" }