@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/20046，作者=“Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Rebacz, Patrick and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan Peter”，标题=“关于在专业护理中使用社交机器人的观点:情景方法研讨会的内容分析”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2021”，月=“11”，日=“10”，卷=“23”，数=“11”，页=“e20046”，关键词=“社交机器人”;机器人技术;卫生保健部门;卫生人员;道德规范;预测;趋势;技术;数字转换;背景:医疗保健部门对数字技术的兴趣正在增长，数字技术可以减轻专业护理人员的负担，同时帮助人们变得更加独立。 Social robots are regarded as a special form of technology that can be usefully applied in professional caregiving with the potential to focus on interpersonal contact. While implementation is progressing slowly, a debate on the concepts and applications of social robots in future care is necessary. Objective: In addition to existing studies with a focus on societal attitudes toward social robots, there is a need to understand the views of professional caregivers and patients. This study used desired future scenarios to collate the perspectives of experts and analyze the significance for developing the place of social robots in care. Methods: In February 2020, an expert workshop was held with 88 participants (health professionals and educators; [PhD] students of medicine, health care, professional care, and technology; patient advocates; software developers; government representatives; and research fellows) from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Using the scenario methodology, the possibilities of analog professional care (Analog Care), fully robotic professional care (Robotic Care), teams of robots and professional caregivers (Deep Care), and professional caregivers supported by robots (Smart Care) were discussed. The scenarios were used as a stimulus for the development of ideas about future professional caregiving. The discussion was evaluated using qualitative content analysis. Results: The majority of the experts were in favor of care in which people are supported by technology (Deep Care) and developed similar scenarios with a focus on dignity-centeredness. The discussions then focused on the steps necessary for its implementation, highlighting a strong need for the development of eHealth competence in society, a change in the training of professional caregivers, and cross-sectoral concepts. The experts also saw user acceptance as crucial to the use of robotics. This involves the acceptance of both professional caregivers and care recipients. Conclusions: The literature review and subsequent workshop revealed how decision-making about the value of social robots depends on personal characteristics related to experience and values. There is therefore a strong need to recognize individual perspectives of care before social robots become an integrated part of care in the future. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/20046", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2021/11/e20046", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/20046", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757318" }