@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/18035，作者=“De Croon, Robin and Van Houdt, Leen and Htun, Nyi Nyi and {\v{S}}tiglic, Gregor and Vanden Abeele, Vero and Verbert, Katrien”，标题=“健康推荐系统:系统综述”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2021”，月=“6”，日=“29”，卷=“23”，号=“6”，页=“e18035”，关键词=“健康推荐系统”;推荐;推荐系统;健康;卫生保健;病人;外行;系统评价;电子健康;评估; recommender technique; user interface; guidelines; mobile phone", abstract="Background: Health recommender systems (HRSs) offer the potential to motivate and engage users to change their behavior by sharing better choices and actionable knowledge based on observed user behavior. Objective: We aim to review HRSs targeting nonmedical professionals (laypersons) to better understand the current state of the art and identify both the main trends and the gaps with respect to current implementations. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and synthesized the results. A total of 73 published studies that reported both an implementation and evaluation of an HRS targeted to laypersons were included and analyzed in this review. Results: Recommended items were classified into four major categories: lifestyle, nutrition, general health care information, and specific health conditions. The majority of HRSs use hybrid recommendation algorithms. Evaluations of HRSs vary greatly; half of the studies only evaluated the algorithm with various metrics, whereas others performed full-scale randomized controlled trials or conducted in-the-wild studies to evaluate the impact of HRSs, thereby showing that the field is slowly maturing. On the basis of our review, we derived five reporting guidelines that can serve as a reference frame for future HRS studies. HRS studies should clarify who the target user is and to whom the recommendations apply, what is recommended and how the recommendations are presented to the user, where the data set can be found, what algorithms were used to calculate the recommendations, and what evaluation protocol was used. Conclusions: There is significant opportunity for an HRS to inform and guide health actions. Through this review, we promote the discussion of ways to augment HRS research by recommending a reference frame with five design guidelines. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/18035", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2021/6/e18035", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/18035", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34185014" }