@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/37367，作者=“Skafle, Ingjerd和Nordahl-Hansen, Anders和Quintana, Daniel S和Wynn, Rolf和Gabarron, Elia”，标题=“关于社交媒体上COVID-19疫苗的错误信息:快速回顾”，期刊=“J医学互联网Res”，年=“2022”，月=“8”，日=“4”，卷=“24”，数=“8”，页=“e37367”，关键词=“社交媒体;错误信息;COVID-19疫苗;疫苗接种犹豫;背景:COVID-19疫苗的开发对抗击大流行至关重要。然而，关于COVID-19大流行和疫苗的错误信息在社交媒体平台上传播的速度使世界卫生组织创造了“信息大流行”一词。在COVID-19爆发之前，关于疫苗不良副作用(例如疫苗是自闭症的原因)的虚假说法已被视为对全球健康的威胁。目的:我们旨在综合现有的关于COVID-19疫苗在社交媒体平台上传播的错误信息及其影响的研究。第二个目的是了解和收集关于自闭症和COVID-19疫苗的错误信息是否正在社交媒体平台上传播。方法:我们于2021年9月9日进行文献检索，检索PubMed、PsycINFO、ERIC、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和Cochrane COVID-19研究登记册。 We included publications in peer-reviewed journals that fulfilled the following criteria: original empirical studies, studies that assessed social media and misinformation, and studies about COVID-19 vaccines. Thematic analysis was used to identify the patterns (themes) of misinformation. Narrative qualitative synthesis was undertaken with the guidance of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 Statement and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guideline. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. Ratings of the certainty of evidence were based on recommendations from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group. Results: The search yielded 757 records, with 45 articles selected for this review. We identified 3 main themes of misinformation: medical misinformation, vaccine development, and conspiracies. Twitter was the most studied social media platform, followed by Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram. A vast majority of studies were from industrialized Western countries. We identified 19 studies in which the effect of social media misinformation on vaccine hesitancy was measured or discussed. These studies implied that the misinformation spread on social media had a negative effect on vaccine hesitancy and uptake. Only 1 study contained misinformation about autism as a side effect of COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: To prevent these misconceptions from taking hold, health authorities should openly address and discuss these false claims with both cultural and religious awareness in mind. Our review showed that there is a need to examine the effect of social media misinformation on vaccine hesitancy with a more robust experimental design. Furthermore, this review also demonstrated that more studies are needed from the Global South and on social media platforms other than the major platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021277524; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display{\_}record.php?ID=CRD42021277524 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.31219/osf.io/tyevj ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/37367", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/8/e37367", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/37367", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35816685" }