JMIR出版物(JMIR Publications)评估学者的影响和影卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析响:基于社交媒体的新型评分与作者水平引用度量相关性的横断面研究% a Oliveira J e Silva,Lucas % a Maldonado,Graciela % a Brigham,Tara % a Mullan,Aidan F % a Utengen,Audun % a Cabrera,Daniel %+美国罗彻斯特梅奥诊所急诊科，罗彻斯特第一街200号，明尼苏达州，55905，美国，1 507 255 4399，cabrera.daniel@mayo.edu %K社交媒体%K Twitter %K期刊影响因子%K h指数%K数字奖学金%K数字平台%K Scopus %K metrics %K scientometics %K altmetrics %K metrics %K stakeholder %K health care %K digital health %D 2021 %7 31.5.2021 %9 Original Paper %J J Med Internet Res %G English %X通过客观评价学者的影响力和影响，开发作者层面的互补指标，可以在学术推广过程中发挥作用。目的:本研究的目的是评估医疗保健社会图谱(HSG)评分(一种新型的社会媒体影响力和影响指标)与h指数(一种传统的作者水平指标)之间的相关性。方法:这是一项横断面研究，于2020年5月从Symplur数据库中随机抽取社交媒体存在的医疗保健利益相关者。我们进行分层随机抽样，以获得具有HSG评分所有阶层的代表性样本。我们在两个基于参考的数据库(Scopus和Google Scholar)中手动查询h-index。将纳入病例的连续特征(HSG评分和h指数)汇总为中位数和IQR。我们计算Spearman相关系数(ρ)来评估HSG分数与从Google Scholar和Scopus获得的h指数之间的相关性。 Results: A total of 286 (31.2%) of the 917 stakeholders had a Google Scholar h-index available. The median HSG score for these profiles was 61.1 (IQR 48.2), and the median h-index was 14.5 (IQR 26.0). For the 286 subjects with the HSG score and Google Scholar h-index available, the Spearman correlation coefficient ρ was 0.1979 (P<.001), indicating a weak positive correlation between these two metrics. A total of 715 (78%) of 917 stakeholders had a Scopus h-index available. The median HSG score for these profiles was 57.6 (IQR 46.4), and the median h-index was 7 (IQR 16). For the 715 subjects with the HSG score and Scopus h-index available, ρ was 0.2173 (P<.001), also indicating a weak positive correlation. Conclusions: We found a weak positive correlation between a novel author-level complementary metric and the h-index. More than a chiasm between traditional citation metrics and novel social media–based metrics, our findings point toward a bridge between the two domains. %M 34057413 %R 10.2196/28859 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2021/5/e28859 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/28859 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34057413