TY - JOUR AU - Peek, Sebastiaan Theodorus Michaël AU - Wouters, Eveline JM AU - Luijkx, Katrien G AU - Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM PY - 2016 DA - 2016/05/03 TI -成功实施老化技术需要什么:焦点小组与利益相关者JO - J医疗互联网Res SP - e98 VL - 18 IS - 5千瓦老年千瓦-独立生活千瓦-技术千瓦-电子健康千瓦-老年人健康服务千瓦-项目和人员管理千瓦-实施管理千瓦-定性研究千瓦-焦点小组AB -背景:通过部署各种类型的技术(即电子健康、环境辅助生活技术、智能家居技术和老年技术)，使老年人能够在适当的地方养老的兴趣越来越大。然而，由于涉及到多个利益相关者团体，旨在实现这些技术的计划变得复杂。利益相关者的目标和动机可能并不总是透明或一致的，但对利益相关者的趋同立场和分歧立场的研究很少。目的:通过回答以下问题，深入了解参与实施老龄化技术的利益相关者群体的立场:利益相关者认为什么样的技术是相关的?涉众通过实现技术的目的是什么?实现成功的实现需要什么?方法:采用单一学科焦点小组，参与者(n=29)代表五组利益相关者:老年人(6/29,21%)、护理专业人员(7/29,24%)、家庭护理或社会工作组织的经理(5/29,17%)、技术设计师和供应商(6/29,21%)和政策制定者(5/29,17%)。文本分析采用专题分析。 Results: Stakeholders considered 26 different types of technologies to be relevant for enabling independent living. Only 6 out of 26 (23%) types of technology were mentioned by all stakeholder groups. Care professionals mentioned fewer different types of technology than other groups. All stakeholder groups felt that the implementation of technology for aging in place can be considered a success when (1) older adults’ needs and wishes are prioritized during development and deployment of the technology, (2) the technology is accepted by older adults, (3) the technology provides benefits to older adults, and (4) favorable prerequisites for the use of technology by older adults exist. While stakeholders seemed to have identical aims, several underlying differences emerged, for example, with regard to who should pay for the technology. Additionally, each stakeholder group mentioned specific steps that need to be taken to achieve successful implementation. Collectively, stakeholders felt that they need to take the leap (ie, change attitudes, change policies, and collaborate with other organizations); bridge the gap (ie, match technology with individuals and stimulate interdisciplinary education); facilitate technology for the masses (ie, work on products and research that support large-scale rollouts and train target groups on how to use technology); and take time to reflect (ie, evaluate use and outcomes). Conclusions: Stakeholders largely agree on the direction in which they should be heading; however, they have different perspectives with regard to the technologies that can be employed and the work that is needed to implement them. Central to these issues seems to be the tailoring of technology or technologies to the specific needs of each community-dwelling older adult and the work that is needed by stakeholders to support this type of service delivery on a large scale. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2016/5/e98/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5253 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143097 DO - 10.2196/jmir.5253 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.5253 ER -