TY - JOUR AU - Ichimiya, Megumi AU - Gerard, Raquel AU - Mills, Sarah AU - Brodsky, Alexa AU - Cantrell, Jennifer AU - Evans, W Douglas PY - 2022 DA - 2022/8/25 TI -数字时代吸烟行为改变干预措施的剂量和反应测量:系统综述JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e38470 VL - 24 IS - 8 KW -数字健康KW -数字媒体KW -社交媒体KW -行为改变干预KW -吸烟KW -电子烟KW -剂量反应KW -远程医疗KW -移动医疗KW -移动医疗KW -移动电话AB -背景:关于针对不同人群的有效数字卫生干预措施，几乎没有达成共识，部分原因是难以量化各种媒体和内容的影响，以及在评估剂量和结果方面缺乏共识。特别是，数字吸烟行为改变干预是一个测量一致性受到挑战的领域，因为新兴产品和快速的政策变化。本研究回顾了数字吸烟干预的内容和结果以及报告的一致性，为未来的研究提供信息。目的:本研究旨在系统回顾数字吸烟行为改变干预措施，并评估测量和报告干预内容、渠道、剂量和反应结果的一致性。方法:采用PubMed、Embase、Scopus、PsycINFO、PAIS等数据库检索2021年1 - 5月的文献。综合了一般搜索和基于期刊的搜索。将所有记录导入covid系统审查软件(Veritas Health Innovation)，并删除重复记录。题目和摘要由4名训练有素的审稿人筛选，以确定合格的全文文献。 The data synthesis scheme was designed based on the concept that exposure to digital interventions can be divided into intended doses that were planned by the intervention and enacted doses that were completed by participants. The intended dose comprised the frequency and length of the interventions, and the enacted dose was assessed as the engagement. Response measures were assessed for behaviors, intentions, and psychosocial outcomes. Measurements of the dose-response relationship were reviewed for all studies. Results: A total of 2916 articles were identified through a database search. Of these 2916 articles, the title and abstract review yielded 324 (11.11%) articles for possible eligibility, and 19 (0.65%) articles on digital smoking behavior change interventions were ultimately included for data extraction and synthesis. The analysis revealed a lack of prevention studies (0/19, 0%) and dose-response studies (3/19, 16%). Of the 19 studies, 6 (32%) reported multiple behavioral measures, and 5 (23%) reported multiple psychosocial measures as outcomes. For dosage measures, 37% (7/19) of studies used frequency of exposure, and 21% (4/19) of studies mentioned the length of exposure. The assessment of clarity of reporting revealed that the duration of intervention and data collection tended to be reported vaguely in the literature. Conclusions: This review revealed a lack of studies assessing the effects of digital media interventions on smoking outcomes. Data synthesis showed that measurement and reporting were inconsistent across studies, illustrating current challenges in this field. Although most studies focused on reporting outcomes, the measurement of exposure, including intended and enacted doses, was unclear in a large proportion of studies. Clear and consistent reporting of both outcomes and exposures is needed to develop further evidence in intervention research on digital smoking behavior change. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2022/8/e38470 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/38470 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006682 DO - 10.2196/38470 ID - info:doi/10.2196/38470 ER -